Too little too late on Iran
In an , he highlighted how his effort to engage Iran in order to solve the nuclear standoff years ago were rebuffed by the Bush war cabinet "cabal":
In fact, in a speech I gave on Iran recently, I stated bluntly that weneeded to open a strategic dialogue, we needed to send high-levelrepresentation to that dialogue, and only if and when that completelyfailed should we even be considering "other options".
I also outlined for my audience all the times -- some when we hadmaximum leverage -- that we refused such dialogue over the past fouryears. The default decision by the cabal -- after it had flummoxed thestatutory process -- was achieved: no talks with evil people,particularly those occupying prominent positions in "the axis".
It all goes back to the point I made in a recent column on this web site about how Bush gets fixated on a policy and never adjusts himself until it is too late. We had chances between 2002 and 2004 to solve the Iran problem. Bush decided against it because it violated his overall foreign policy doctrine of talking with members of the "axis of evil". Now that it is too late, Bush is all of a sudden trying to start dialogue them. Why does everything always have to be so backward?
Recent Comments