Election results skewed towards GOP

The November 7th election may have been an even larger landslide than we had thought.  The Election Defense Alliance is alleging that election results were skewed by about 4%, or three million votes towards the GOP:

A major undercount of Democratic votesand an overcount of Republican votes in U.S. House and Senate racesacross the country is indicated by an analysis of national exit pollingdata, by the Election Defense Alliance (EDA), a national election integrity organization.

These findings have led EDA to issue an urgent call for furtherinvestigation into the 2006 election results and a moratorium ondeployment of all electronic election equipment.

"We seeevidence of pervasive fraud, but apparently calibrated to politicalconditions existing before recent developments shifted the politicallandscape," said attorney Jonathan Simon, co-founder of ElectionDefense Alliance, "so 'the fix' turned out not to be sufficient for theactual circumstances." Explained Simon, "When you set out to rig anelection, you want to do just enough to win. The greater the shift fromexpectations, (from exit polling, pre-election polling, demographics)the greater the risk of exposure--of provoking investigation. What wasplenty to win on October 1 fell short on November 7.

"Thefindings raise urgent questions about the electoral machinery and votecounting systems used in the United States," according to SallyCastleman, National Chair of EDA. "This is a nothing less than anational indictment of the vote counting process in the United States!"

Imagine how many House and Senate seats the Democrats could have picked up if this was indeed true?  Maybe Ford could have won in Tennessee.  Maybe 40 or 45 House seats could have been a possibility.  Again, I would like to see more evidence on this from either side before rushing to judgment.

Comments

[George]

more evidence? ha! It's lost inside a microprocessor forever.

And to those who will write you off as a conspiracy theorist if you buy into this story, why dont they support a paper trail?
Most political arguments have 2 sides. This one does not. It is wrong to not demand a paper trail.

What if Enron had no paper trail? What if your bank account had no paper trail? What if history had no paper trail? It's just insane.