« Troops would stay in Iraq under Hillary presidency | Main | (Video) Two conservatives vs one semi-liberal on Fox News »

2007.03.15

What the Libby verdict was really about

Time Magazine's Michael Duffy makes it rather obvious:

From the start, the case was only marginally about Libby. What was really on trial was the whole culture of an Administration that treated the truth as a relative virtue, as something it could take or leave as it needed. Everyone knows now that Bush and Cheney took the country into a deadly, costly and open-ended war on flimsy evidence of weapons of mass destruction. Yes, Congress went along. And yes, the public on balance supported it. But no one was more responsible than the Vice President for pushing the limits of the prewar intelligence that did all the convincing. And when former ambassador Joseph Wilson questioned the credibility of that intelligence — and the motives that helped polish it — it was Cheney who led the fight to bring him down.

Republican lawmakers must be furious each time the Vice President goes out on the stump and makes outrageous comments, like the kind he made about Democrats this week.  Incidents like that make it more difficult for the GOP to get its message across.  All Cheney gets them is negative publicity.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/488060/16911740

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What the Libby verdict was really about:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Recent Comments

Stats

Legal

  • All literature taken off this page and reprinted must be properly quoted and linked.
  • Copyright 2008: Todd Haskins, The Blue State www.thebluestate.com thebluestate.typepad.com

Blue Ads

Blogad Network