« NH-2008: Why Hillary will root for Ron Paul | Main | When impatience is a good thing »

2007.11.08

IA-2008: Iowa race in a statistical three-way tie

For Hillary, Edwards and Obama, Iowa is anybody's race to win.  A new Zogby poll shows that each of them are in contention:

Iowa Democrats (likely caucus-goers)

Hillary Clinton - 28%
Barack Obama - 25%
John Edwards - 21%

Now to the next part -- and this is where is gets mighty interesting.  According to caucus rules, if after a precinct votes a candidate receives less than 15% of the vote, all the individuals who voted for that candidate must either forfeit their vote or support a candidate above the 15% threshold.

At the moment, it seems like in almost every precinct only Hillary, Obama and Edwards will be above the 15% threshold.  So it all comes down to which candidate Biden, Richardson, Dodd, Gravel and Kucinich supporters will switch their votes to.  Here are the results:

                                                          
   

 

   
   

First Choice Only

   
   

Including Second Choices of Those Who First   Backed Unviables

   
   
Clinton
   
   

28%

   
   

30%

   
   

Obama

   
   

25%

   
   

29%

   
   

Edwards

   
   

21%

   
   

27%

   
   

Not Sure

   
   

12%

   
   

15%

In other words, we are all tied up in Iowa.  Just to note, according to Zogby, John Edwards was able to make up the most ground because most Biden and Richardson supporters jumped to his side.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/488060/23155724

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference IA-2008: Iowa race in a statistical three-way tie:

Comments

Awesome information, Todd. And very good news as well. If Iowa can pull this off for non-Hillary, I'll put Iowa right up there with Virginia in my favorite 'change the game' state.

colbert gravel kucinich paul nader [conyers?] united for truth elicit fear smear blacklist.

honesty compassion intelligence guts...

Yes, Virginia was sure something in 2006. Speaking of Virginia, from what I'm hearing, Jim Webb might be brought on by Hillary, Barack or Edwards as a VP. Under Hillary though, he would have a much more limited role. LOL Even I wouldn't want to be Hillary's VP. You wouldn't have influence on anything.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Recent Comments

Stats

Legal

  • All literature taken off this page and reprinted must be properly quoted and linked.
  • Copyright 2008: Todd Haskins, The Blue State www.thebluestate.com thebluestate.typepad.com

Blue Ads

Blogad Network