Cheney to make cameo, and why Libby is screwed
While that Karl Rove would have been cleared weeks ago had he been innocent, there is also fresh news on the Scooter Libby front. Word late yesterday that circulated throughout Washington faster than Jeff Gannon could interrupt a White House press conference. In a filing in court yesterday, special prosecutor are very important in determining whether Libby lied to federal officials:
Libby "shared the interests of his superior and was subject to hisdirection," the prosecutor wrote. "Therefore, the state of mind of thevice president as communicated to (the) defendant is directly relevantto the issue of whether (the) defendant knowingly made false statementsto federal agents and the grand jury regarding when and how he learnedabout (Plame's) employment and what he said to reporters regarding thisissue."
In looking at this statement closely, what Fitzgerald wrote about Cheney was very significant. If Libby lied to federal agents and the grand jury partly because Libby was "subject to his (Cheney's) direction," then this really puts Cheney in a huge predicament. In other words, the Vice President will likely play a huge role in the trial.
But Cheney's situation is not even close to as stressful as what Libby is going through. because they have unmistakable proof that Scooter Libby did lie to both federal officials and the grand jury. Read this carefully:
Both CIA officials - including a top architect of the 2003 Iraqinvasion - discussed Plame with Libby a month before columnist RobertNovak blew her cover in July 2003, prosecutors charge.
Libby has said journalists told him about Plame - not Cheney or the six witnesses named so far by prosecutors.
In other words, Libby had already testified under oath before this year that reporters were the ones that told him the identity of CIA agent Valerie Plame. However, these two witnesses will testify that they talked to Libby about Plame before Libby talked with reporters, proving that Libby lied. Oops!
Recent Comments